Paper Writing Services gives the other pleasure, and the pleasure given is the ultimate end in the relationsp (Cooley, 2002). Therefore, if you have a
Abstract |
---|
my mom said if you want to make sometng of yourself, you have to be good and reach your potential. I tnk the bar for “being good” was also set too gh, like soul friendsps. It’s either that or my potential was to be an underacever. ???? I like to tnk of soul friendsp and potential in the |
I believe we have less of an obligation to nurture soul friendsps than any other friendsps. Nurturing a soul friendsp goes against what soul friendsps are. I tnk if you actually do have a soul friendsp, it should be the easiest friendsp you have and require no nurturing. It just come’s natural. But a friendsp of utility takes real work. Friendsp isn’t like money. Generally speaking, you can work harder and get more money if that’s what you want. But friendsps aren’t like that. If you’re working hard at a friendsp, isn’t it likely that the friendsp is actually a friendsp of pleasure, or a friendsp of utility. A friendsp you want sometng out of. As Cooley (my favorite in the course) said, A pleasure friendsp is one in wch each person gives the other pleasure, and the pleasure given is the ultimate end in the relationsp (Cooley, 2002). Therefore, if you have a goal of having a soul friendsp, and you have to work at aceving that goal, it seems like what you really have is a friendsp of pleasure because of the pleasure it will give you to say you have a soul friendsp. I’m getting dizzy. As I’ve read about soul friendsps in the course, it doesn’t really seem like they exist. Even in marriage. I like what Emerson had to say about if you don’t have ts ultimate friendsp. Just having a part of it seems to be worthwle (Vernon, p. 240). Friends are good. Even with the labels. I don’t despair because I don’t tnk I have a soul friendsp. It doesn’t mean there’s anytng wrong with my marriage. Instead, there’s sometng wrong with the existence of non-existent soul friendsps. I prefer to tnk of soul friendsps as a target. I tnk the bar has been set so gh for a friendsp of the soul as to make it impossible. I agree with Montaigne’s claim that they hardly ever happen, although s once every three centuries estimate would need to be revised based on the increased population (Vernon, p. 225). Oh, and how very nice that Montaigne claims to have been one of the once every three centuries lottery winners. Soul friendsps are like the ten commandments. Nobody can live up to them? Closer to home, it’s like when my mom said if you want to make sometng of yourself, you have to be good and reach your potential. I tnk the bar for “being good” was also set too gh, like soul friendsps. It’s either that or my potential was to be an underacever. ???? I like to tnk of soul friendsp and potential in the same way; sometng to shoot for, but don’t expect it to happen. Besides, what you end up with may end up being even better. My life is good. References: Cooley, D. R. (2002). “False Friends.” (195-207). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Vernon, M. (2010). . New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 1: Friends at Work
Sample references |
---|
|
Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.
Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer