Paper Writing Services sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question. ❒ Include your research question followed by your

Abstract
that takes a well-articulated, clear, specific position on one side of an issue.Includes a working thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of an issue.Includes a working thesis that takes a clear position on one side of an issue; however it lacks specificity.Includes a working thesis; however, it lacks specificity and does not take a

Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. Ts will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for ts assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on ts pre-writing process. ❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question. ❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question. ❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis. Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. The research question and working thesis are the driving force bend your research and eventual argument. For ts essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Wch source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for ts course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone. The introduction of ts paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels: Finally, you will include a conclusion wch shows your final assessments on both counts. Using your research question, working thesis, and outline from Touchstone 1.2, create an annotated bibliography that provides a synopsis of your sources and an explanation of how you will use them. In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for ts course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone. Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay. In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for ts course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone. Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine wch areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support. ❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s). ❒ An introduction, at least five body paragraphs, and a conclusion. ❒ Introduction includes your working thesis. ❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points. ❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts. ❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea ❒ Sources: one to three for each paragraph, as relevant, indicating the support for the key points ❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or information relevant to your argument (e.g. “Lappé on mono-cropping corn/soy and production”). ❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities? ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses? ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%) Pose a meaningful research question on a debatable topic.Constructs a precise and focused research question relative to a current and debatable topic.Constructs a focused research question relative to a debatable topic.Constructs a research question relative to a debatable topic; however it is somewhat too broad or too narrow for the assignment.Constructs a research question; however, the question is too broad or too narrow for the assignment and/or it is not debatable.Does not construct a research question, or constructs a research question that does not meet any of the rubric criteria. Propose a focused working thesis.Includes a working thesis that takes a well-articulated, clear, specific position on one side of an issue.Includes a working thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of an issue.Includes a working thesis that takes a clear position on one side of an issue; however it lacks specificity.Includes a working thesis; however, it lacks specificity and does not take a clear position.Does not include a working thesis, or includes a thesis that does not take a position. Present a detailed outline that includes coherent headings, subheadings, and source placement notes.Outline is thoroughly developed and clearly labeled with effective notes, such that the reader can easily see how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present.Outline is well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present.Outline is primarily well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get an overall sense of how the essay will build its argument; however, a few necessary elements may be unclear or missing.Outline is not fully developed and/or labeling and notes are often unclear, such that the reader cannot easily get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; several necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing.Outline is not developed and/or labeling and notes are unclear or absent, such that the reader is unable to see how the essay will build its argument; most necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing. Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Follow conventions for standard written English.There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage. Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present. The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on ts assignment:

Sample references
  • (‘Zanardelli, J. 2012. At the intersection of the academy and practice at Asbury Heights. Oxford Handbook of evidence-based management. New York: Oxford ‘,)
  • (‘Jouzel, J., V. Masson-Delmotte, O. Cattani, G. Dreyfus, S. Falourd, G. Hoffmann, B. Minster, J. Nouet, J. M. Barnola, J. Chappellaz, H. Fischer, J. C … (232 characters truncated) … Tison, M. Werner, and E.W. Wolff. 2007. Orbital and millennial Antarctic climate variability over the past 800,000 years. Science 317(5839):793-797.’,)
  • (‘Angel, S., S. Sheppard, and D. Civco. 2005. The Dynamics of Global Urban Expansion. Washington, DC: Department of Transport and Urban Development, The World Bank.’,)
  • (‘Alley, W. M., T. E. Reilly, and F. O. Lehn. 1999. Sustainability of ground-water resources. In U.S. Geological Survey Circular. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior. Available at http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS22429. Accessed December 3, 2009.’,)

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer