Paper Writing Services transit. Similar to the Network Design Proposal in CMIT 265, your deliverable should explain the requirement, propose a solution, and justify the

Abstract
software; and secure the data at rest and in transit. Similar to the Network Design Proposal in CMIT 265, your deliverable should explain the requirement, propose a solution, and justify the solution. You should make use of the TestOut LabSim material to create the task, and study for CompTIA Security+ certification. You should also make use of other

You have been red as part of the network security team at UMUC.  After completing orientation and training, your manager calls you into a meeting to discuss your first project. The university has completed the implementation of the leased building in Adelp, Maryland.  If you recall, ts was the Network Design Proposal completed in CMIT 265.  The university realizes it needs to secure the faculty, students, and visitors network and data.  With your background and skills, the university is looking to you for guidance.  In addition to helping the university secure its network, you are required to obtain your CompTIA Security+ certification witn 60-days of being red. You’ve been asked to perform network security analysis and planning, secure the boundary devices, hosts, and software; and secure the data at rest and in transit.  Similar to the Network Design Proposal in CMIT 265, your deliverable should explain the requirement, propose a solution, and justify the solution.  You should make use of the TestOut LabSim material to create the task, and study for CompTIA Security+ certification.  You should also make use of other sources as required.  It is important that your deliverable explain the technical issues in layman’s terms.  Before you begin, make sure to review the Network Security Proposal (Parts 1-3). Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for public key infrastructure (PKI). Provided an outstanding description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for public key infrastructure (PKI). Provided a description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for public key infrastructure (PKI). Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for public key infrastructure (PKI), but lacked an appropriate justification. Identified technical requirements for public key infrastructure (PKI), but the proposal and justification lacked detail and/or was not well supported. The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for public key infrastructure (PKI) were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail. Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the secure protocol implementation. Provided an outstanding description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the secure protocol implementation. Provided a description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the secure protocol implementation. Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for the secure protocol implementation, but lacked an appropriate justification. Identified a technical requirement for the secure protocol implementation, but the proposal and justification lacked detail and/or was not well supported. The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the secure protocol implementation were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail. Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for file encryption. Provided an outstanding description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for file encryption. Provided a description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for file encryption. Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for file encryption, but lacked an appropriate justification. Identified a technical requirement for file encryption, but the proposal and justification lacked detail and/or was not well supported. The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for file encryption were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail. Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the hasng method. Provided an outstanding description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the hasng method. Provided a description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the hasng method. Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for the hasng method, but lacked an appropriate justification. Identified a technical requirement, but the proposal and justification for the hasng method lacked detail and/or was not well supported. The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the hasng method were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail. Provided an excellent description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the backup and restoration system and processes. Provided an outstanding description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the backup and restoration system and processes. Provided a description of the technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the backup and restoration system and processes. Provided a description of the technical requirements and proposal for the backup and restoration system and processes, but lacked an appropriate justification. Identified a technical requirement for the backup and restoration system and processes, but the proposal and justification lacked detail and/or was not well supported. The technical requirements, proposal, and justification for the backup and restoration system and processes were off topic or failed to provide required level of detail. Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited sources. Reference list entries and in-text citations are correctly formatted using the appropriate IEEE style for each type of resource. The description appropriately used information from 5 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government wte papers and authoritative Web sites. Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited sources. One or two minor errors in IEEE format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. The description appropriately used information from 4 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government wte papers and authoritative Web sites. Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited sources. No more than 5 minor errors in IEEE format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. The description appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government wte papers and authoritative Web sites. Work contains a reference list containing entries for cited sources. Work contains no more than 5 minor errors in IEEE format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. The description appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government wte papers and authoritative Web sites. Work attempts to credit sources but demonstrates a fundamental failure to understand and apply the IEEE formatting standard. The description appropriately used information from 1 or more authoritative sources, i.e. journal articles, industry or trade publications, news articles, industry or government wte papers and authoritative Web sites.

Sample references
  • (‘Dzewaltowski, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Estabrooks, P. A., & Brock, E.(2004). RE-AIM: Evidence-based standards and a web resource to improvetranslation of research into practice. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 28(2), 75.’,)
  • (‘Everett LQ, Sitterding MC. Transformational leadership required to design and sustain evidence-based practice: a systemexemplar. West J Nurs Res. 2010;33(3):398-426.’,)
  • (‘Eccles, M., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science.Implementation Science, 1(1), 1-3.’,)
  • (‘Dubois, C. A., D’Amour, D., Pomey, M. P., Girard, F., & Brault, I. (2013).Conceptualizing performance of nursing care as a prerequisite for bettermeasurement: A systematic and interpretive review. BMC Nursing, 12(1), 7.’,)

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer